Helping and Modal
Auxiliary Verbs
Helping
verbs or auxiliary verbs such as will, shall, may, might, can,
could, must, ought to, should, would, used to, need are used in conjunction with main verbs to express shades of time and mood.
The combination of helping verbs with main verbs creates what are called verb phrases or verb
strings. In the following sentence, "will have been" are helping
or auxiliary verbs and "studying" is the main verb; the whole verb
string is underlined:
Ø As of next August, I will have been studying chemistry for ten years.
Students
should remember that adverbs and contracted forms are not, technically, part of
the verb. In the sentence, "He has already started." the adverb already modifies the verb, but it is not
really part of the verb. The same is true of the 'nt in "He hasn't started yet"
(the adverb not,
represented by the contracted n't,
is not part of the verb, has
started).
Shall,
will and
forms of have, do and be combine with main verbs to indicate
time and voice. As auxiliaries, the verbs be,
have and do can change form to indicate changes in
subject and time.
Ø I shall go now.
Ø He had won the election.
Ø They did write that novel together.
Ø I am going now.
Ø He was winning the election.
Ø They have been writing that novel for a long time.
Uses of Shall and Will and Should
In England, shall is used to express the simple future
for first person I andwe, as in "Shall we
meet by the river?" Will would be used in the simple future for
all other persons. Using will in the first person would express
determination on the part of the speaker, as in "We will finish this
project by tonight, by golly!" Usingshall in second and third persons would
indicate some kind of promise about the subject, as in "This shall be
revealed to you in good time." This usage is certainly acceptable in the
U.S., although shall is used far less frequently. The
distinction between the two is often obscured by the contraction’ll, which is the same for both verbs. In
the United States, we seldom use shall for anything other than polite
questions (suggesting an element of permission) in the first-person:
Ø "Shall
we go now?"
Ø
"Shall I call a doctor for you?"
(In
the second sentence, many writers would use should instead, although shouldis somewhat more
tentative than shall.) In the U.S., to express the future
tense, the verb will is used in all other cases.
Shall is often used in
formal situations (legal or legalistic documents, minutes to meetings, etc.) to
express obligation, even
with third-person and second-person constructions:
Ø The
board of directors shall be responsible for payment to stockholders.
Ø
The college president shall report
financial shortfalls to the executive director each semester."
Should is usually
replaced, nowadays, by would.
It is still used, however, to mean "ought to" as in
Ø You
really shouldn't do that.
Ø
If you think that was amazing, you should
have seen it last night.
In
British English and very formal American English, one is apt to hear or readshould with the first-person pronouns in
expressions of liking such as "I should prefer iced tea" and in
tentative expressions of opinion such as
Ø I
should imagine they'll vote Conservative.
Ø
I should have thought so.
Uses of Do, Does and Did
In the simple present tense, do will function as an auxiliary to express the negative and to ask
questions. (Does, however, is substituted for third-person, singular
subjects in the present tense. The past tense did works with all persons, singular and
plural.)
Ø I
don't study at night.
Ø She
doesn't work here anymore.
Ø Do
you attend this school?
Ø Does
he work here?
These
verbs also work as "short answers," with the main verb omitted.
Ø Does
she work here? No, she doesn't work
here.
With
"yes-no" questions, the form of do goes in front of the subject and the
main verb comes after the subject:
Ø Did your grandmother know Truman?
Ø Do wildflowers grow in your back yard?
Forms
of do are useful in expressing similarity and differences in conjunction with so and neither.
Ø My
wife hates spinach and so does my son.
Ø My
wife doesn't like spinach; neither do I.
Do is also helpful
because it means you don't have to repeat the verb:
Ø Larry
excelled in language studies; so did his brother.
Ø Raoul
studies as hard as his sister does.
The
so-called emphatic do has many uses in English.
Ø To
add emphasis to an entire sentence: "He does like spinach. He really does!"
Ø To
add emphasis to an imperative: "Do come in." (actually softens the
command)
Ø To
add emphasis to a frequency adverb: "He never did understand his father." "She
always does manage to hurt her mother's
feelings."
Ø To
contradict a negative statement: "You didn't do your homework, did
you?" "Oh, but I did finish it."
Ø To
ask a clarifying question about a previous negative statement: "Ridwell
didn't take the tools." "Then who did take the tools?"
Ø
To indicate a strong concession:
"Although the Clintons denied any wrong-doing, they did return some of the gifts."
In the absence of other modal
auxiliaries, a form of do is used in question and negative
constructions known as the get
passive:
Ø Did Rinaldo get selected
by the committee?
Ø
The audience didn't get riled up by the
politician.
Uses of Have, Has and Had
Forms of the verb to have are used to create tenses known as the present perfect and past
perfect. The perfect tenses indicate that something has happened in the
past; the present perfect indicating that something happened and might be
continuing to happen, the past perfect indicating that something happened prior
to something else happening. (That sounds worse than it really is!) See the
section on Verb Tenses in the Active Voice for further
explanation; also review material in the Directory of English Tenses.
To have is also in
combination with other modal verbs to express probability and possibility in
the past.
Ø As
an affirmative statement, to
have can express how certain
you are that something happened (when combined with an appropriate modal + have + a past participle): "Georgia
must have left already." "Clinton might have known about the
gifts." "They may have voted already."
Ø
As a negative statement, a modal is
combined with not + have + a past participle to express how
certain you are that something did not happen: "Clinton might not have
known about the gifts." "I may not have been there at the time of the
crime."
Ø
To ask about possibility or probability in
the past, a modal is combined with the subject + have + past participle: "Could Clinton
have known about the gifts?"
Ø
For short answers, a modal is combined with have: "Did Clinton know
about this?" "I don't know. He may have." "The evidence is
pretty positive. He must have."
To
have (sometimes
combined with to get) is
used to express a logical inference:
Ø It's
been raining all week; the basement has to be flooded by now.
Ø
He hit his head on the doorway. He has got
to be over seven feet tall!
Have is often combined
with an infinitive to form an auxiliary whose meaning is similar to
"must."
Ø I
have to have a car like that!
Ø She
has to pay her own tuition at college.
Ø He
has to have been the first student to try that.
Modal
Auxiliaries
Other
helping verbs, called modal
auxiliaries or modals, such as can, could, may, might, must, ought
to, shall, should, will, and would,
do not change form for different subjects. For instance, try substituting any
of these modal auxiliaries for can with any of the subjects listed below.
I
you (singular) he we you (plural) they |
can write well.
|
There is
also a separate section on the Modal Auxiliaries, which divides these verbs into their various meanings of
necessity, advice, ability, expectation, permission, possibility, etc., and
provides sample sentences in various tenses. See the section on Conditional Verb Forms for help with the modal auxiliary would. The shades of meaning
among modal auxiliaries are multifarious and complex. Most English-as-a-Second-Language
textbooks will contain at least one chapter on their usage. For more advanced
students, A University Grammar
of English, by Randolph Quirk and Sidney Greenbaum, contains an excellent,
extensive analysis of modal auxiliaries.
Uses of Can and Could
The modal
auxiliary can is used
Ø To
express ability (in the sense of being able to do something or knowing how to
do something):
He
can speak Spanish but he can't write it very well
Ø To
expression permission (in the sense of being allowed or permitted to do
something):
Can
I talk to my friends in the library waiting room? (Note that can is less formal than may. Also, some writers will
object to the use of canin
this context.)
Ø to
express theoretical possibility:
American
automobile makers can make better cars if they think there's a profit in it.
The
modal auxiliary could is used
Ø to
express an ability in the past:
I
could always beat you at tennis when we were kids.
Ø to
express past or future permission:
Could
I bury my cat in your back yard?
Ø to
express present possibility:
We
could always spend the afternoon just sitting around talking.
Ø to
express possibility or ability in contingent circumstances:
If
he studied harder, he could pass this course.
In expressing ability, can and could frequently also imply willingness: Can
you help me with my homework?
Can versus May
Whether the auxiliary verb can can be used to express permission or
not — "Can I leave the room now?" ["I don't know if you can, but
you may."] — depends on the level of formality of your text or situation.
As Theodore Bernstein puts it in The
Careful Writer, "a
writer who is attentive to the proprieties will preserve the traditional
distinction: can for ability or power to do something, mayfor permission to do it.
The question is at what level can you
safely ignore the "proprieties." Merriam-Webster's Dictionary, tenth
edition, says the battle is over and can can be used in virtually any
situation to express or ask for permission. Most authorities, however,
recommend a stricter adherence to the distinction, at least in formal
situations.
Uses of May and Might
Two
of the more troublesome modal auxiliaries are May and might.
When used in the context of granting or seeking permission, might is the past tense of May. Might is considerably more tentative than May.
Ø May
I leave class early?
Ø If
I've finished all my work and I'm really quiet, might I leave early?
In the context of expressing
possibility, may and might are interchangeable present and future
forms and might + have + past participle is the past form:
Ø She
might be my advisor next semester.
Ø She
may be my advisor next semester.
Ø She
might have advised me not to take biology.
Avoid confusing the sense of
possibility in may with the implication of might,that a hypothetical
situation has not in fact occurred. For instance, let's say there's been a
helicopter crash at the airport. In his initial report, before all the facts
are gathered, a newscaster could say that the pilot "may have been injured." After we
discover that the pilot is in fact all right, the newscaster can now say that
the pilot "might have
been injured" because it is a hypothetical situation that has not
occurred. Another example: a body had been identified after much work by a
detective. It was reported that "without this painstaking work, the body may have remained unidentified."
Since the body was, in fact, identified, might is clearly called for.
Uses of Will and Would
In
certain contexts, will and would are virtually interchangeable, but
there are differences. Notice that the contracted form 'll is very frequently used for will.
Will can be used to express willingness:
Ø I'll wash the
dishes if you dry.
Ø We're going to the
movies. Will you join us?
It can also express intention (especially in the first
person):
Ø I'll do my
exercises later on.
and prediction:
Ø specific: The
meeting will be over soon.
Ø timeless: Humidity
will ruin my hairdo.
Ø habitual: The river
will overflow its banks every spring.
Would can also be used to
express willingness:
Ø Would you please
take off your hat?
It can also express
insistence (rather rare, and with a strong stress on the word
"would"):
Ø Now you've ruined
everything. You would act that way.
and characteristic
activity:
Ø customary: After
work, he would walk to his home in West Hartford.
Ø typical (casual):
She would cause the whole family to be late, every time.
In a main clause, would can express a hypothetical meaning:
Ø My cocker spaniel
would weigh a ton if I let her eat what she wants.
Finally, would can express a sense of probability:
Ø I
hear a whistle. That would be the five o'clock train.
Uses of Used
to
The auxiliary verb construction used to is used to express an action that took
place in the past, perhaps customarily, but now that action no longer
customarily takes place:
Ø We used
to take long vacation trips with the whole family.
The spelling of this verb is a problem
for some people because the "-ed" ending quite naturally disappears
in speaking: "We yoostoo take long trips." But it ought not to
disappear in writing. There are exceptions, though. When the auxiliary is
combined with another auxiliary, did, the past tense is carried by the new
auxiliary and the "-ed" ending is dropped. This will often happen in
the interrogative:
Ø Didn't
you use to go jogging every morning before breakfast?
Ø It didn't
use to be that way.
Used to can also be used to convey the
sense of being accustomed to or familiar with something:
Ø The tire
factory down the road really stinks, but we're used to it by now.
Ø I like
these old sneakers; I'm used to them.
Used to is best reserved for colloquial
usage; it has no place in formal or academic text.
Modals – Auxi….
1) Can
Use
|
Examples
|
ability
to do sth. in the present (substitute form: to be able to)
|
I can speak English.
|
permission
to do sth. in the present (substitute form: to be allowed to)
|
Can I go to
the cinema?
|
request
|
Can you wait a moment, please?
|
offer
|
I can lend you my car till tomorrow.
|
suggestion
|
Can we visit Grandma at the weekend?
|
possibility
|
It can get very hot in Arizona.
|
2) Could
Use
|
Examples
|
ability
to do sth. in the past (substitute form: to be able to)
|
I could speak English.
|
permission
to do sth. in the past (substitute form: to be allowed to)
|
I could go to the cinema.
|
polite
question *
|
Could I go to the cinema, please?
|
polite
request *
|
Could you wait a moment, please?
|
polite
offer *
|
I could lend you my car till tomorrow.
|
polite
suggestion *
|
Could we visit Grandma at the weekend?
|
possibility
*
|
It could get very hot in Montana.
|
3) May
Use
|
Examples
|
possibility
|
It may rain today.
|
permission
to do sth. in the present (substitute form: to be allowed to)
|
May I go to the cinema?
|
polite
suggestion
|
May I help you?
|
4) Might
Use
|
Examples
|
possibility
(less possible than may) *
|
It might rain today.
|
hesitant
offer *
|
Might I help you?
|
5) must
Use
|
Examples
|
force,
necessity
|
I must go to the supermarket today.
|
possibility
|
You must be tired.
|
advice,
recommendation
|
You must see the new film with Brad Pitt.
|
6) must
not/may not
Use
|
Examples
|
prohibition
|
You mustn't work on dad's computer.
You may not work on dad's computer. |
7) need
not
Use
|
Examples
|
|
not
necessary
|
I needn't go to the supermarket, we're going to
the restaurant tonight.
|
|
8) ought
to
Use
|
Examples
|
|
advice
|
You ought
to drive carefully
in bad weather.
|
|
obligation
|
You ought
to switch off
the light when you leave the room.
|
|
9) shall
instead of
will in the 1st person
Use
|
Examples
|
suggestion
|
Shall I carry your bag?
|
10)
should
Use
|
Examples
|
advice
|
You should drive carefully in bad weather.
|
obligation
|
You should switch off the light when you leave the
room.
|
11) will
Use
|
Examples
|
wish,
request, demand, order (less polite than would)
|
Will you please shut the door?
|
prediction,
assumption
|
I
think it will rain on
Friday.
|
promise
|
I will stop smoking.
|
spontaneous
decision
|
Can
somebody drive me to the station? - I will.
|
habits
|
She's
strange, she'll sit for hours without talking.
|
12)
would
Use
|
Examples
|
wish,
request (more polite than will)
|
Would you shut the door, please?
|
habits
in the past
|
Sometimes
he would bring me
some flowers.
|